Protomodernism is a design style that occurred from 1897
until 1959 and spread through Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, and the United
States. Even though this movement competed with Art Nouveau and Arts and Crafts
for attention, it held its ground because of how unique it was. While
Protomodernism was similar to Art Nouveau with the acceptance of modern
technology and production methods, it completely differed when it came to
ornamentation and materials used.
Protomodernism rejected ornamentation and historical styles
and focused primarily on experimentation with forms and ideas. A main
consideration of this movement was to ensure that the highest quality of design
could be produced for the masses, and this was done through the use of plywood,
aluminum, and beechwood. Another main consideration was functionality over
physical beauty. With the other movements, beauty was found in the ornamentation,
joinery, or hardware. Protomodernism teaches that the true beauty of a space is
found in its functionality and overall form.
Through this movement, many wonderful architects and designers
emerged, such as Otto Wagner and Gerrit Reitveld. Otto Wagner was a very
prominent member of the Vienna Secession who believed that understanding
different materials and choosing them wisely would lead to good design. He also
believed that designers should choose materials that were available, workable,
durable, and economical in order to produce worthwhile work. Gerrit Reitveld
was an architect who contributed to De Stijl (the style) in the Netherlands.
This style focused on elementary shapes, colors, flat surfaces, as well as
horizontal and vertical lines and Reitveld embodied all of these details. His
designs were very geometric, smooth, simple, affordable, functional, and clad
in the three primary colors. Both of these architects/designers paved the way
for a new method of designing and a new way of thinking.
Protomodernism was a design style unmatched by any other
style of that time. It brought to attention the fact that furniture doesn’t
have to be ornamented to be beautiful and that, sometimes, the function of a
piece of furniture is more important than the beauty of it, anyway.
Design Examples
The Steiner House by Adolf Loos
A dining chair by Frank Lloyd Wright
Current Applications
One Step Further
Otto Wagner was born in Vienna, Austria on July 13, 1841. He
studied art and architecture at the Technical University in Vienna, the
Bauakademie in Berlin, and then the Academy of Fine Arts back in Vienna. Wagner
designed Art Nouveau architecture up until 1894 when he became a professor at
the Academy of Fine Arts and started preaching functionalism. He stated that “modern
art must yield for us modern ideas, forms created for us, which represent our
abilities, our acts, and our preferences. Objects resulting from modern views […]
harmonize perfectly with our surroundings, but copied and imitated objects
never do.” Wagner believed that “necessity is the sole mistress of art,” and
took that idea through his designs and material choices.
Wagner’s functionalism/modernism was shown primarily through
Sankt Leopold in Penzing as well as the Postal Savings Bank in Vienna. The
design of Sankt Leopold focused on squares, rectangles, and other linear forms,
while the design of the Postal Savings Bank was characterized by linearity,
smoothness, and crispness through the use of marble, aluminum, and glass. His
design of the Vienna railroad also shows his more modernist approach. As a
professor, his students included both Josef Hoffmann and Josef Olbrich, other
modernist architects. These two helped Wagner develop his modernist style in
other stations, such as the Hofpavillion and the Karlsplatz Station.
Otto Wagner joined the Vienna Secession in 1897 along with
Gustav Klimt, Josef Olbrich, Josef Hoffman, and Koloman Moser. Through this
group, he developed his modernist style and became even better known as an
architect. Before his death, one of his students was quoted as saying “modern
architecture began with Mackintosh in Scotland, Otto Wagner in Vienna, and
Louis Sullivan in Chicago.”





I found protomodernism very interesting to study. The idea that a piece of furniture or a room could be designed for functional purposes only, and display no ornamentation was unheard of at this time. And I believe that is why I find it so intriguing. It was the first design style and movement to recognize that sometimes functionality is more important than beauty. Sometimes when we focus to much on how a space or piece of furniture looks, we forget about the way in which the space or furniture piece is used and we forget about the function.
ReplyDeleteSo, I found your response very thoughtful and also insightful, because you clearly defined this idea. Also, I enjoyed your closer look at Otto Wagner. He was a very interesting architect and artist!
I think the simplicity of Protomodernism is what I find to be the most interesting. There is nearly no ornamentation whatsoever, yet many would consider this style to be quite beautiful. I think that this style challenges people to really think about what they're designing. They ask the questions, "What is the function?" and "What are the materials to be used?" The beauty of Protomodernism is found in the function and materials. This idea is still influential today in modern design.
ReplyDeleteI like how you talk about that potomodernism focused more on the functionality of the space and taking that and making it something beautiful. Having a building with good function I feel can be a hard thing sometimes and maybe that is why some designer focus a lot on the beauty of the building because it may not be a great funtional building but the average person may not notice because they are too busy looking at the beauty of the building.
ReplyDeleteCatie- Very nice summary! I really liked your examples- images. Otto Wagner was a good choice to study in more detail. Wagner was very influential with his peers as well as his students!
ReplyDelete